“The temptation to be
relevant is difficult to shake since
it is usually not considered a temptation, but a call.
We make ourselves believe that we are called to be
productive, successful, and efficient people whose words and actions show
that working for God’s Reign is at least as dignified an occupation
as working for General Electric, Mobil Oil, or the government.”
– Henri Nouwen
it is usually not considered a temptation, but a call.
We make ourselves believe that we are called to be
productive, successful, and efficient people whose words and actions show
that working for God’s Reign is at least as dignified an occupation
as working for General Electric, Mobil Oil, or the government.”
– Henri Nouwen
Relevance is something we
hear a lot about today. We want to make
the message relevant. We need to show
people a Jesus who is relevant. A good
deal is riding on the automatic assumption that relevancy is always a good
thing.
What if it's not?
What could be more shallow
and more damning than absolute relevance?
What if relevance is like a siren song of a smiling temptress pulling
the people of God into a broad dark alley?
What if a Jesus designed to makes sense to America, by definition, turns
out to be so altered his own mother would not recognize him?
Relevance certainly drives a
great deal of thinking in many churches.
“Look here, people, we can meet your needs.” “We have the answers you are looking for.”
The problem is that such
relevancy also serves as the rationale for placing performance over piety or
counting decisions instead of disciples.
If it works, then we know it must be true. Has this become the ultimate question of
contemporary canonicity? Truth, at least
the truth we tell, no longer filtered through "Is it apostolic?" But,
rather, "Does it work?"
We can see relevancy in our
massive ecclesio-malls, where discerning consumers can stroll through specialty
shops of various subchurches and ministries.
But, we also see it in coffee-shop church practiced by edgy radicals
quoting Chomsky. We hear it in the
faddish jargon of the moment, tossed out as secret signals calling the
well-read out the larger herd into our clubhouse. And, we even see it in the token soup
kitchens offered up by compassionate suburbanites who carefully lock up their
cars and keep their keys close by just in case.
The great danger of relevance
is that, unlike the old infection of rational-liberalism, it doesn’t kill the
patient as quickly. Its self-defeating
disease cycle takes longer to surface.
Worse, for a few years, it gives the endorphins of stunning success. It
is like believing we have now uncovered a great panacea spreading growth and
prosperity, health and happiness into every church it touches. The bright glow of the latest wunderkinds hides
the wreckage of crystal cathedrals, whose successes were once touted as loudly
as their deaths are now quietly ignored.
We assume the United States
remains the admiration of the Christian world.
We look across the pond at the cavernous stone crypt-cathedrals, now
little more than the gravestones of a glorious past. Poor Europe.
So very post-christian. All the
while, we hardly notice, Europe is staring back at our oh-so-American
repackaged Christianity, all wrapped in stars and stripes, eagerly campaigning
for more red states. We find ourselves
in the peculiar situation of having a very loud voice with which we have
nothing much to say, proving something can grow large while simultaneously
disappearing from sight.
Eucharist is not relevant.
Silence is not relevant.
Confession is not relevant.
Liturgy, certainly, is not
relevant.
Perhaps, one day only our
disembodied grin will remain...
There is something remarkably
thoughtless about abandoning it all in the name of relevancy. Happy clappy churches laughing at liturgy is a
little like the bamboo stalk laughing at the oak because it can grow so much
faster. All rather short sighted, don't
you think?
God calls us into the culture
of the Kingdom, from which we are to actively engage the culture around us. The church is not the cloister. But, he does not suggest following Christ
should be explained as effective or helpful or productive or useful or
relevant. Only a maddening misuse of
scripture culls from it ten principles of marriage enrichment or twelve steps
to financial independence or three keys to managing bipolar disorder. Whole sections of scripture are quietly
censored so pastors can take yet another need-meeting trip through selected
parables of Jesus or the four chapters of Philippians.
The gospel of the kingdom
calls us to radically re-align our values so that relevancy itself becomes
re-aligned. To the wealthy young seeker,
too enamored with his capital gains, Jesus showed little interest in either
meeting his needs or explaining the practical effectiveness of selling all that
he had. He did not tell him that
simplifying would make him happier. He
never suggested it was some kind of test in which, if the man said yes, he
would then be allowed to keep his money, or at least 9/10ths of it. He did not launch into a presentation on the
dangers of hell or the four simple steps of faith that are as easy as saying
the sinner's prayer. The demand to sell
and follow is laid out with a startling lack of relevancy.
Christ, of course, is more
than relevant. The church does not need
to pretend the gospel heals and restores and uplifts and frees and changes
getting up every day from mere existence to life in the fullest sense. Jesus does not need to be revised or fixed or
made less Jewish or more understandable.
In a book that should be
required reading for every American church leader, In the Name of Jesus, Nouwen writes, "To be a Christian
who is willing to travel with Christ on his downward road requires being
willing to detach oneself constantly from any need to be relevant, and to trust
ever more deeply the Word of God. Thus, we do not resist the temptation to be
relevant by doing irrelevant things, but by clinging to the Word of God who is
the source of all relevancy."
The great serendipity of the
Kingdom of God is that Christ brings His own relevance with Him, revealing it only
from the inside out.
It seems to me that this yearning for relevancy (which also drives me nuts) comes out of a mindset of "salesmanship" -- we make our message more relevant and then we have a better product to sell. But then the Gospel isn't something to be sold and coaxing people to it with empty promises isn't an effective means of changing lives. Christ changes lives and living the Gospel is much better than hawking it like a charlatan at a medicine show as if it's a cure-all. Christianity doesn't cure everything that ails us. In fact, Jesus promised that being his disciple would be hard. But he also promised that he would be with us and for us and in the end he would change us and in this new state we would truly be healed.
ReplyDeleteGlad I found your blog. Thanks for letting me rant a bit. I feel better now.